Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I'm gonna try to write a AS example for the DataFilterLib and post it here.
Sorry for the delay, i thought i would get an email when someone raise an issue
but
well, i didn't
Fabien
Original comment by fnicol...@gmail.com
on 16 Apr 2010 at 1:50
hello , i'm using your library for my school projects and as said before i'm
facing
many problems while using this library with AS3 , could you please give us more
examples for adding filters dynamically.
thanks in advance
Original comment by othmane....@gmail.com
on 31 May 2010 at 11:39
Ok, i'm gonna post an example on my blog (flex-tutorial.fr), in english, surely
tonight. I'll send the link in a comment on this page.
Fabien
Original comment by fnicol...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2010 at 12:02
Hi,
here is the blog post on how to use the DataFilterLib only using ActionScript:
http://www.flex-tutorial.fr/2010/06/01/datafilterlib-using-the-datafilterlib-wit
h-actionscript-code-only/
It's on a french blog but it's written in english, don't worry :).
I can write some more AS examples but if you have understood this one, i think
you
should be able to reproduce any other example with no problem.
If you need some more AS examples or some help on your project, i'll be glad to
help.
Just send me an email at fnicollet (AT) gmail (.) com
Cheers,
Fabien
Original comment by fnicol...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2010 at 8:40
Original comment by fnicol...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2010 at 8:41
In reading the very first post, I too had the exact same issue. I read your
post about how to use it in actionscript that the primary difference is that
you are setting the filterValue via a UI component where the original poster
and I want to set it to a value while creating the parameters.
I made the following change to the DataFilterSingleValue.as constructor and it
worked the way as the original poster would like:
public function DataFilterSingleValue(parameters:DataFilterParameters) {
super(parameters);
// change starts here
if( parameters != null ) {
_values = parameters.filterValues;
}
// change ends here
}
Would you consider making this change part of the code base?
Original comment by theyoung...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2010 at 1:36
Thanks for this patch, it is now committed in the trunk version. I am going to
make a minor release set it as latest
Thanks!
Fabien
Original comment by fnicol...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2010 at 1:58
Thank you for such great response time. I will update my local project with
your new version.
Thanks again
Original comment by theyoung...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2010 at 5:16
If you run into any issue or you would like some new feature to be implemented,
please ask (in here or on my email)
Have a nice day
Fabien
Original comment by fnicol...@gmail.com
on 27 Jun 2010 at 5:18
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
yahmad...@hotmail.com
on 19 Nov 2009 at 11:22