Open blikblum opened 3 years ago
I modified the demo/attachment.js
test script (source here) to reproduce this issue with a second embedded file (resulting pdf here, then validated it with verapdf's PDF/A-3A validation profile, this is the result.
(Github doesn't allow .js or .xml uploads, so those files are uploaded as .txt instead)
A few issues came up with the embedded files (some of which should probably be fixed), but none of them mentioned the missing /Limits
key. Is it possible verapdf doesn't check for that?
I can not create the same pdf with Adobe Acrobat, because embedding files seems to be a paid feature.
The free version can only add files with annotations, which as far as I know doesn't add entries to the /EmbeddedFiles
dictionary anyways.
Here is a pdf with multiple embedded files created with Foxit Reader instead, which also opens correctly in Adobe Reader.
If you (or anyone else) want to take a closer look at the pdf created with Foxit, I recommend these PDF Tools to make sense of the compressed /ObjStm
at 20 0 obj
, it includes the /Pages
and /EmbeddedFiles
dictionaries.
Anyways, these are the contents of that Object stream:
"1 0 2 37 6 81 8 125 13 229 14 290 16 362 17 429 19 505
<</Type/Pages/Kids[ 7 0 R ]/Count 1>>
<</Dests<</Names[]>>/EmbeddedFiles 17 0 R >>
<</ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>
<</ModDate(D:20210326135820+01'00')/Producer 9 0 R /Title 12 0 R /Creator 10 0 R /CreationDate 11 0 R >>
<</Fields[]/DA(/Helv 0 Tf 0 g)/DR<</Font<</Helv 14 0 R >>>>>>
<</BaseFont/Helvetica/Encoding/WinAnsiEncoding/Subtype/Type1/Type/Font>>
<</UF(test.png)/EF<</F 15 0 R >>/Desc()/F(test.png)/Type/Filespec>>
<</Names[(\xfe\xff\x00C\x00H\x00A\x00N\x00G\x00E\x00L\x00O\x00G\x00.\x00m\x00d) 19 0 R (\xfe\xff\x00t\x00e\x00s\x00t\x00.\x00p\x00n\x00g) 16 0 R ]>>
<</UF(CHANGELOG.md)/EF<</F 18 0 R >>/Desc()/F(CHANGELOG.md)/Type/Filespec>>"
I believe the <</Names[(\xfe…
part is the /EmbeddedFiles
dictionary, and it seems to not include /Limits
in here either - did the specification on Name Trees change so that Limits is not required anymore?
Maybe it's not actually an issue if Foxit Reader is doing the same thing.
Maybe it's not actually an issue if Foxit Reader is doing the same thing.
Yes. its a possibility. Just want to keep track
Bug Report
Limits entry is not emitted when attaching files due to incompatibility with Adobe Reader
Description of the problem
See info at https://github.com/foliojs/pdfkit/pull/1226
We should evaluate if is possible to implement file attachment in a more compliant way