Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In my configuration, there are many scattered hacker code snippets that can implement custom sources, such as gitsigns, lsp_xxx, marks, etc. After thorough research, I found that it might be more appropriate and feasible to leave the task of custom sources to the plugins themselves. This not only centralizes the previously scattered snippets into a more suitable place, but also enhances maintainability and consistency. Although they may need to adhere to certain standards (perhaps?). Therefore, I would like to know if there are plans to open up the task of custom sources to the user side. If you think this is a good idea, I am willing to contribute the code (just need some help).
Did you check the docs?
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
In my configuration, there are many scattered hacker code snippets that can implement custom sources, such as gitsigns, lsp_xxx, marks, etc. After thorough research, I found that it might be more appropriate and feasible to leave the task of custom sources to the plugins themselves. This not only centralizes the previously scattered snippets into a more suitable place, but also enhances maintainability and consistency. Although they may need to adhere to certain standards (perhaps?). Therefore, I would like to know if there are plans to open up the task of custom sources to the user side. If you think this is a good idea, I am willing to contribute the code (just need some help).
Regards!
Describe the solution you'd like
see above
Describe alternatives you've considered
see above
Additional context
No response