Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
That rubyripper reports a lot of differences after the first trials, I
consider a
cdparanoia bug. Apparently sometimes all bytes are shifted or something like
that.
However the filesize doesn't change. So there is nothing I can do about that. I
could reset ripping the track if a lot of differences are found, if that's
usefull.
The options you used for cdparanoia here are: never skip (-z), abort on skip
(-X)
and read speed at 1x (-S 1). Although I fail to see the improvement of -X when
-z
is already in use, with these settings cdparanoia will try real hard to get the
audio info of the disc.
Soms discs however, can't be repaired. You will find the same behaviour with
Exact
Audio Copy. That's why I put in an option to set a max of trials. The whole
idea is
that if a cd can't be corrected, cdparanoia returns random data. According to
your
post this pretty much happens.
Although rubyripper does not correct the track completely, after trial 8, I am
pretty sure that you're not able to hear it. 1 chunk represents only a small
amount
of time, far less than a second.
All in all, I'm closing this isssue, as I don't believe it's a bug. If it were,
we
would have noticed so way before.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 4 Apr 2007 at 8:30
Did not know that about CD paranoia shifting bytes. Thought it would throw up
some
type of correction in the status bar if it did.
-X is an old habit on my part; it really never aborts. Yeah, it looks like a
disc
that can't be repaired... however it must lay with cdparanoia; I guess it is
possible
when -z isn't used it falsely reads repeatedly and considers the error fixed,
while
when using -z it truly grabs random data.
On first look I thought one of the settings might have been confusing rr, but I
should learn that cdparanoia is usually to blame ;)
Original comment by mordbr...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2007 at 1:08
Well cdparanoia isn't always to blame offcourse ;) But in this particular case
I
think it is. Things like bad repairing should happen on at least a few discs to
raise suspicion.
Original comment by rubyripp...@gmail.com
on 9 Apr 2007 at 8:10
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
mordbr...@gmail.com
on 31 Mar 2007 at 11:41