Open davelab6 opened 5 years ago
Did it actually happen already?
Did what happen? We have some Chinese, Japanese and Korean fonts already
Did what happen? We have some Chinese, Japanese and Korean fonts already
is there any family supporting more than one of the 4 CJK scripts?
Noto Sans HK and some of the Chinese Simplified fonts were detected as supporting several. The metadata generator should be fixed too, but this is a fail safe request
The git repo at https://github.com/googlefonts/noto-cjk contains ttc files, but I don't see them at https://github.com/google/fonts/
In order to work in this issue I'm interested in looking at the bad METADATA.pb files that the check must detect in a FAIL scenario.
@m4rc1e do you have a script that will sync fonts in the API to the git repo?
ping, @m4rc1e
do you have a script that will sync fonts in the API to the git repo?
@felipesanches apologies but I don't fully understand. I'm assuming you want a script that will take a family from fonts.google.com and generate us a family dir in our google/fonts repo?
The only script I have is a reporter that will tell me which families haven't made it into fonts.google.com yet.
A few weeks ago I was trying to work on this issue and I was unable to find where the CJK fonts on the google/fonts repo. Then @davelab6 suggested that perhaps the CJK fonts were pushed to the API directly (without going through the google/fonts repo first) and that perhaps you had a script that could be useful in this case. I simply copied here Dave's original question to you, so I am unsure exactly what he meant.
let's make things simpler here: what are the valid values for the subsets
field in a METADATA.pb of CJK fonts?
@chrissimpkins, maybe you can help us clarify here what to do in this check (and how to do it). Dave's original description for this issue is too short and lacks a more detailed definition of the problem.
@chrissimpkins agreed to be assigned this issue so that he'll be working on this new check request to be part of our new CJK fontbakery profile.
Sure happy to help here. Please let me know where I can find the CJK fonts and metadata files that you would like to have reviewed. I don't have any specific FB check in mind at the moment because I don't understand what process is failing here. Please add detail so that I can understand.
we need a more detailed description of the issue from @davelab6
@chrissimpkins I've pushed a commit to my personal account with a boilerplate of a new CJK profile. Please use that to prepare a PR when you start creating CJK checks. A single cjk check is enough for me to review and merge the PR and then you can gradually add more checks as usual.
I hope this is useful. The commit is available at https://github.com/felipesanches/fontbakery/commit/9fde1ce000ed4a88a254f6aca00c72d0a45850f1
Thanks Felipe! I will have a look. I really appreciate it
Here are the lists of fonts by locale:
Seems like a consistent pattern across the CJK fonts. There are no METADATA.pb files for any of these CJK projects as far as I can tell. Removing my assignment for this issue as I don't understand what is being requested here. If someone can expand on the needs for this check, I'd be happy to revisit this issue.
@davelab6 could you please clarify the requirements here?
I see that the METADATA files made internally haven't been reposted upstream. I will try to get that done
This is literally only about the METADATA files, not about font data.
Once we get the METADATA files available on their respective repos, I will reassign this issue to myself and use the METADATA files as a reference for implementing (and testing) this rather simple check.
If a family supports one of the 4 CJK scripts, it should not support any of the other 3.