Open davelab6 opened 4 years ago
could you please clarify "exq thing"?
Are we discussing here a proposal of a check specific to fi-fl-ffi-ffl
ligatures?
Or are we talking bout a broader issue that involves a larger set of potential ligatures?
also...
Eqx, by sorkin type
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, 8:14 PM Felipe Corrêa da Silva Sanches < notifications@github.com> wrote:
Assigned #2747 https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2747 to @davelab6 https://github.com/davelab6.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/googlefonts/fontbakery/issues/2747?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAB73S6H7KX74RHOPQUYGJTRCNEQFA5CNFSM4KOWUD52YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFWZEXG43VMVCXMZLOORHG65DJMZUWGYLUNFXW5KTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOWSE5UOQ#event-3028933178, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB73S2ZUBWO3L5B6L3BM33RCNEQFANCNFSM4KOWUD5Q .
Yeah this could be an EQX pass fail question or possibly 2+ basic questions which build to a family consistency question. I'll have a look at this post Merriweather and revise the source. For some reason I don't recall if I made Gelasio into a VF. If I somehow didn't I'll do that as well.
Observed behaviour
https://twitter.com/mjdye/status/1223762539768467456?s=19
Expected behaviour
Ligatures should be technically checked for existing, and visually checked for similarities. The latter might be more of an exq thing