Closed paulo-ferraz-oliveira closed 3 years ago
WDYT?
Might work, let me try. I wasn't looking at this "latest" part and had even forgotten about that subject 😄
Edit: 4279dac 👈 if this passes, the only question here is "Do we want to keep 24.0
next to latest
- which would mean that we'd need to know what latest
is, every time -, or are we Okay with a potentially duplicate CI run, currently "24.0
and latest
"?
Edit 2: actually, let me try and add some if
to it.
I'll squash everything now. @andreineculau, how'd'you like the end result?
Edit: left some comments here and there, for review clarity.
Thanks for the changes! 🎉
re: https://github.com/for-GET/jesse/pull/105#issuecomment-831594243 I remember replying to you, but heck if I know what happened to my reply. I was asking you if you have a clever idea to not need to manually update that, or at least add a check so CI fails when we forget to update.
I have a suggestion around that: since there is a
erlang:latest
docker image, we could maybe havelatest
in the list forotp_vsn
and then the shell check can be simplyif matrix.otp_vsn = latest then ...
(pseudo). WDYT?