It is possible to have two validators one Jailed and one Active with different consensus addresses but the same operator address. Becasue the DB table validator_info contains the unique modifier for the operator_address .
Steps to reproduce
* Create a validator with `pub key 1`, `operator address 1`, and `self delegate address 1`
* Stop the validator and let it be jailed
* Undelegate from the validator
* Run BDJuno and let it sync the data (and keep it running)
* Create a validator with `pub key 2`, `operator address 1`, and `self delegate address 1`
* Check BDJuno logic the `violates unique constraint "validator_info_operator_address_key"` error will there
* Try to update validators state using the cli `bdjuno parse staking validators --home .bdjuno`, the same error will error out.
## Expected behavior
It is possible to have two validators one Jailed and one Active with different
consensus addresses
but the sameoperator address
. Becasue the DB tablevalidator_info
contains the unique modifier for theoperator_address
.Steps to reproduce
* Create a validator with `pub key 1`, `operator address 1`, and `self delegate address 1` * Stop the validator and let it be jailed * Undelegate from the validator * Run BDJuno and let it sync the data (and keep it running) * Create a validator with `pub key 2`, `operator address 1`, and `self delegate address 1` * Check BDJuno logic the `violates unique constraint "validator_info_operator_address_key"` error will there * Try to update validators state using the cli `bdjuno parse staking validators --home .bdjuno`, the same error will error out. ## Expected behaviorThe BDJuno should save both validators.