Closed ValentineHerr closed 4 years ago
@ValentineHerr I am working through fixing errors today so I'll push the latest data when I'm done.
(1) For your first two sets of issues, you caught errors. I fixed those on my end. (2) For the third set of issues:
site.id 274 was measured repeatedly with different plot sizes in different years. Data are correct. site.id 60, should have plot.size = 0.09. I fixed the issue. site.id 5575, should have N = 1 for litter measures. I fixed the issue. site.id 2286/2287 were measured repeatedly with different plot sizes in different years. Data are correct. site.id 2229 should have N=1 for all measures (3/4 referred to sub plot measurements). I fixed the issue. site.id 3606 was measured repeatedly with different plot sizes in different years. Data are correct. site.id 5572/5573/5574 should have N=1 for all measures. I fixed the issue. site.id 319 was measured repeatedly with different plot sizes in different years. Data are correct. site.id 2046 was measured repeatedly with different plot sizes in different years. Data are correct. site.id 13968 was measured repeatedly with different plot sizes in different years. Data are correct.
@ValentineHerr I pushed new data...did you get the new sitesf and nonsoil csvs?
Yes both files are updated on my side. I'll try to run codes ASAP and let you know if things are more smooth now.
Coming back to this. @teixeirak, How do you want to deal with plots that were repeatedly measured with different plot.area? Currently, @CookPatton gives the same plot.id but I don't think that is in compliance with ForC.... Should I give them a different plot name ? for example: plot.name = plot.name + [plot.area]
Note: [ForC's plot.area = GROA's plot.size * n] so sometimes the difference in plot.area is due to differences in n rather than plot.size.
After in person discussion with @teixeirak we decided to:
@teixeirak and @CookPatton,
Here are a few problems I found while trying to build the ForC HISTORY table for GROA data. Let me know if you can think of ways to fix or deal with that.
1- There are 5 plots that have more than one type of prior.duration (shown separated by a comma in value of the table bellow). NB: date and stand.age are the same for all records involved.
2- There are 6 plots that sometimes have "F" in prior but sometimes nothing (shown separated by a comma in value of the table bellow). NB: date and stand.age are the same for all records involved.