finish histogram for publication

[teixeirak]

@mawilliams99 and @ValentineHerr ,

Madison started this histogram (thank you!) for her paper. Let's get this finished.

Here's the placeholder with a caption that tries to describe what I'd envision:

Again, there's plenty of room for creativity/ other suggestions here.

@mawilliams99 , are you hitting a sticking point on this? @ValentineHerr , I believe you still have some time on this project that we could use to get this worked out?

[teixeirak]

We'll want all the figures for the paper in this folder. If it's easier, we can create in the main GitHub repo and copy them over here.

[ValentineHerr]

@mawilliams99 where is your script for this figure?

@teixeirak, what should be on the x-axis?

[teixeirak]

The x-axis should be dominant vegetation types.

[ValentineHerr]

can you define relevant to EFDB? Is it what is EFDB_ready but not sent yet, or just everything that would be sent (according to our criterias) if we assumed everything had been reviewed and flagged as EFDB_ready? (which might be a stretch if, for example, ForC does not specify that the measurement is found in a figure or is calculated, etc...).

[teixeirak]

It's the latter, or more simply all of the records for the variables we send.

[ValentineHerr]

Does this look good?

[ValentineHerr]

"relevant" is n records with variable name to provide to IPCC, that is not "suspected.duplicate" (in ForC_simplified) and for which we have citation and language (was easier to add code for histogram after that filter, I can change if necessary)

[ValentineHerr]

Do with FAO instead, using codes in https://www.fao.org/3/ad652e/ad652e10.htm

[ValentineHerr]

• [x] add one hist for continent and one for age (composite figure) - For age <20 - 100 - >100, NA
• [x] keep Dominant vegetation, add unclassified, + add a other category with 2TD, 2TN or categories with < 500 records in ForC (same for FAO etc...)

[teixeirak]

@ValentineHerr , overall this looks great!

Copied here for reference. Here are a few things I'd tweak:

• [x] add legend
• [x] for dominant vegetation, it would be great if we could fit the vegetation type names rather than the codes.
• [x] for dominant vegetation, would be best to order with other and then unclassified last
• [x] for FAO ecozone, again it would be best to put other second-to-last
• [x] for continent, let's just list them all, and then perhaps we need an "Oceanic" category for other.
• [x] stand age is perfect! :-)

[ValentineHerr]

new versions:

[teixeirak]

Looks fantastic!

In panel A, could you please put "Broadleaf (mixed E/D)" to clarify why these are separate? And in panel C, could you please change Oceania to "Islands"? (Sorry, I realized that Oceania actually refers to a particular geographic region.)

[teixeirak]

Also, could you please save .csvs with these numbers so that @mawilliams99 can use them to fill in the results section?

[ValentineHerr]

Oceania is actually what is ForC. So I think we can leave it as is. don't you think?

[teixeirak]

Yes, it's okay. I verified in the sites table that all with that label are actually Oceania, whereas other islands are associated to continents (e.g., Puerto Rico is North America).

[teixeirak]

Perfect; thank you!