Closed teixeirak closed 1 year ago
Here's a table to track this.
study | complete as initially sent | records to retrieve | new records added | notes / corrections / clarifications |
---|---|---|---|---|
Archibald_2009_doiv | x | records sent were NEE, but that's not a variable that they want. It was sent 4/2/21, but is not posted to website because deemed inappropriate. | ||
Broadbent_2014_isas | primary forests (n=4) | |||
Chave_2008_aepa | (x) | some records (especially biomass) not sent because they were deemed duplicates of estimates from more recent publications. On 4/28/21, Valentyna communicated that they prefer for us to just send the best estimates, so I think this one is complete as initially sent. | ||
Crowell_1994_vdia | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Feldpausch_2004_cana | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Fleming_1998_conm | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Gonzalez-Akre_2016_potm | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Helcoski_2019_gsmd | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Ishihara_2016_anmf | Study needs to be withdrawn. https://github.com/forc-db/ForC/issues/253 | |||
Lin_2012_tvia | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Litton_2004_eotd | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Litton_2003_scde | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Lutz_2018_giol | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Ma_2012_rdri | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Manlay_2002_cnap | Yes | No records to retrieve | correction required: https://github.com/forc-db/IPCC-EFDB-integration/issues/37 | |
McGarvey_2015_csio | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Meakem_2018_rots | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Ngo_2013_csip | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Rothstein_2004_laro | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Sharma_2010_tdac | Yes | No records to retrieve | ||
Tepley_2017_vtfl | Yes | No records to retrieve | data were entered by the study author | |
Uhl_1984_sand | ||||
Wieser_2005_necd | ||||
Wirth_2002_babc |
@mawilliams99 , it would be great if you could help with this, although it may be tricky. Let's discuss when we talk today.
Two things to check:
@mawilliams99 , did you get a chance to review the final 3 studies here?
Calling this done.
Valentyna requested that we get all relevant data from the publications we send. This requires going back and reviewing to check if there were additional data.