Regarding the Data Quality fields, my current plan is to leave these blank. We do have some information related to data quality in ForC (for example, biomass allometries used, reliability of methods applied, etc.), but it is variable-specific and not currently organized into a quality ranking scheme that could be readily transferred. We may be able to develop such a scheme, but not in time for next week. Please let me know if you have any comments on this.
from Valentyna:
Let me also respond to this question. For now, the most relevant info is about CI. All the rest info could be added later, if time allows.
My email to Valentyna:
Regarding the Data Quality fields, my current plan is to leave these blank. We do have some information related to data quality in ForC (for example, biomass allometries used, reliability of methods applied, etc.), but it is variable-specific and not currently organized into a quality ranking scheme that could be readily transferred. We may be able to develop such a scheme, but not in time for next week. Please let me know if you have any comments on this.
from Valentyna:
Let me also respond to this question. For now, the most relevant info is about CI. All the rest info could be added later, if time allows.
We may wish to return to this at some point.