@ValentineHerr , one other small change on the map: I think it would be useful to present ForC sites and maybe records, as one of our stated goals in the abstract is "We then assess the data currently available through ForC...".
I'm not sure how many bars can fit nicely. If only 3, I'd do tree cover area, ForC sites, and sites submitted. If 5 can fit nicely, we might consider tree cover area, ForC sites, ForC 43cords, and sites submitted, records submitted. I think the latter might be overkill, though.
@ValentineHerr , one other small change on the map: I think it would be useful to present ForC sites and maybe records, as one of our stated goals in the abstract is "We then assess the data currently available through ForC...".
I'm not sure how many bars can fit nicely. If only 3, I'd do tree cover area, ForC sites, and sites submitted. If 5 can fit nicely, we might consider tree cover area, ForC sites, ForC 43cords, and sites submitted, records submitted. I think the latter might be overkill, though.