search

force11 / force11-sciwg

FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group
https://www.force11.org/group/software-citation-implementation-working-group
BSD 3-Clause "New" or "Revised" License
56 stars 18 forks source link

Software Citation Guidance Task Force #56

Closed npch closed 1 year ago

npch commented 6 years ago

This task force has the goal of producing guidance for different stakeholders to interpret and implement the Software Citation Principles.

Tasks

cm-j0nes commented 6 years ago

I would like to volunteer for this - Catherine

dbouquin commented 6 years ago

Interested!

mrchristian commented 6 years ago

Hi I can help here from TIB / Generation R and relating these too Open Science MOOC and to learning resources

ljhwang commented 6 years ago

+1

sdruskat commented 6 years ago

+1 (though spread across 2 task forces)

augustfly commented 6 years ago

+1 (but I suspect I'll be on the publisher one too)

sdruskat commented 6 years ago

Written some simplistic intro guidance for both developers and researchers who are perhaps new to the whole topic, at https://cite.research-software.org/. Perhaps can be made useful in the context of this task force?

mrchristian commented 6 years ago

Contribute to research authors and for software makers

jhausman commented 6 years ago

I'm sure there will be some ESIP participation in this, producer and publisher

katrinleinweber commented 6 years ago

Over in https://github.com/force11/force11-sciwg/issues/48#issuecomment-372022915 we learned that BibLaTeX/biber supports 90% of the SCPs already. I wasn't in the June 5th meeting, I apologise, but I'd like to suggest that we more urgently need some pull/merge requests / patches against the style files of software-focussed journals. I'm guessing that those might have both the interest to distinguish software citations from papers, as well as authors who would particularly care about that.

I have the JSS TeX sources on my hard-drive for example, but I do not know how to adjust existing styles to actually render a software citation as for example Wolfram suggested: https://doi.org/10.5446/35357#t=16:15,16:41

His self-contained example worked fine :-) If someone wants to help adjust existing styles based on a dedicated software citation style, please let me know.

ShelleyStall commented 6 years ago

Please include me!

danielskatz commented 6 years ago

Also worth reading from @katrinleinweber: Concrete Advice for FAIR Software

mrchristian commented 6 years ago

And there is a video with @katrinleinweber posted at the bottom on the article, comparing and contrasting citation options https://doi.org/10.5446/35351 (thats a better link)

npch commented 5 years ago

Hi All,

could you indicate in this Doodle which time is best for the first call for this task force?

https://doodle.com/poll/ra7k6igsv4eqgeps

owlice commented 5 years ago

I'm interested!

paopao74cn commented 5 years ago

+1

Melissa37 commented 5 years ago

👍 I'd like to participate as a publisher stakeholder

mingfangwu commented 5 years ago

+1 I wouldn't be able to attend online call (btw 2am to 5am here), hope I can contribute offline if possible.

npch commented 5 years ago

The time of our first call for the Software Citation Guidance Task Force will be at 16:00 UTC on Wednesday 28th November Alternative timezones: https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20181128T160000&p1=304&p2=tz_pt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=tz_cet&p6=152

I'm going to try using Jitsi for the call:

Agenda and more details are here: https://github.com/force11/force11-sciwg/blob/master/meetings/20181126-Guidance.md

@mingfangwu I've suggested an second regular timeslot as well - let me know if this works for you.

npch commented 1 year ago

Closing to clean-up issues. This guidance has now been completed in the form of checklists and published.