Open ian-h-chamberlain opened 9 months ago
This issue is a request to enable selecting lines on both sides of the diff
I can't implement that, those are two separate controls.
It seems like this is already possibly when using the unified diff view
Yes, because it's a single text control.
hopefully it's just a matter of handling the mouse drag across the two columns and applying the same underlying logic afterwards?
No, it's slightly more complicated.
Ah, okay, the fact that they are separate controls probably means the click-and-drag I was thinking of doesn't make sense. Maybe as an alternative it would be more feasible to allow cmd+drag
or shift+drag
to select parts on both sides of the diff? I'm not sure if multi-selection like that would be any easier to implement than what I was describing before, but I think it would satisfy my request as well.
Thanks for the quick response!
Hi, thanks for making Fork, I use it every day and love it a lot! One feature I really like is the ability to stage / discard one hunk at a time in the side-by-side diff of "Local Changes":
However, sometimes a hunk as decided by
git
is too big, and I'd rather stage or discard just a few lines at a time. This is possible by selecting the lines, but only on one side of the diff at a time, as best I can tell:This means that in cases where a single line was changed (e.g. the first line in the above example), I have to first select one side, stage it, then select the other side, then stage that. This issue is a request to enable selecting lines on both sides of the diff, and staging/discarding them together with one click (a user-defined hunk, if you prefer to think of it that way).
It seems like this is already possibly when using the unified diff view (as opposed to side-by-side), so hopefully it's just a matter of handling the mouse drag across the two columns and applying the same underlying logic afterwards?
Thanks!