Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
[deleted comment]
Hey L783xz5g,
you have probably installed JRE 32Bit. Please install JRE 64Bit and this issue
should be fixed.
Best regards,
Nils
Original comment by nilsheu...@google.com
on 15 Aug 2012 at 10:51
Fixed.
Never thought about 64bit java, because IDA itself is only 32bit.
Thanks for the quick response,
Stefan
Original comment by L783x...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2012 at 11:02
Original comment by nilsheu...@google.com
on 15 Aug 2012 at 11:06
Original comment by nilsheu...@google.com
on 22 Aug 2012 at 12:11
How did you fix this problem?
Original comment by ViicMac...@hotmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 3:58
The problem was not fixed by changing code. What happens here is that the
BinDiff IDA PlugIn tries to reserve more Java VM memory than a 32bit JRE can
address resulting in the error mentioned above. So using a 64bit JRE ensures
that even bigger flow and callgraphs can be loaded and displayed if the system
has enough RAM available.
Best regards,
Nils
Original comment by nilsheu...@google.com
on 15 Oct 2013 at 1:34
Hello,
I am having the same issue with the following configuration:
BinDiff 4.0.1 Release (Build 15464)
Windows 7 Pro 32bit
IDA Pro Version 6.5.140116 (32-bit)
Java RE 7.0.55 (32 bit)
Running inside VMWare Workstation
Obviously installing java RE 64bit is not an option.
Original comment by rotem.sa...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2014 at 4:32
You could try this:
http://www.zynamics.com/kb/kb0003.html
Note: With just 1GB of VM memory medium sized callgraphs or big/huge flowgraphs
may not fit into memory which results in crashes as well…
Best regards,
Nils
Original comment by nilsheu...@google.com
on 20 May 2014 at 7:41
Hi Nils,
First off, thanks for the fast reply, and your solution helped keep working.
I tried this and this works when i run BinDiff directly via the cmd file, but
it still crashes when I click the "View flowgraphs" option from IDA (unless I
execute BinDiff manually beforehand), is there a way to workaround this
permenantly?
Original comment by rotem.sa...@gmail.com
on 21 May 2014 at 3:19
No, sorry, this is currently the only solution for your situation.
Original comment by nilsheu...@google.com
on 21 May 2014 at 5:22
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
L783x...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2012 at 10:32