Closed ugeorge closed 5 years ago
OK, I agree to the changes. It makes sense, although it will break some existing examples (for instance in the book chapter). But it is good, if we have the same format as in CSDF and SADF! So, please integrate the changes!
Since we make an API-breaking revision, I would like to propose we take out
delaySDF
which seems to be redundant, and replaceable bydelaynSDF
.delatnSY
behaves completely different thandelaynSDF
, and has different semantics to start with. Having the same name for so different constructors again makes no sense.delayCSDF
anddelaySADF
based on thedelaynSDF
model.So, my proposal is to dump
delaySDF
and to renamedelaynSDF
todelaySDF
.