When updating an appversion by name, the appversion to be updated must be specified as appName:versionName. However, the --name option (to rename the application version) expects a plain version name rather than newAppName:newVersionName. This may be confusing to users, potentially making them rename appName:versionName to appName:appName:versionName. Also, it means that currently it is not possible to update the application name using the appversion update command, which is not consistent with the SSC UI.
How can we make this more consistent? Simple have --name require app:version (also allowing to rename the app), have it accept both version and app:version, ...?
When updating an appversion by name, the appversion to be updated must be specified as
appName:versionName
. However, the--name
option (to rename the application version) expects a plain version name rather thannewAppName:newVersionName
. This may be confusing to users, potentially making them renameappName:versionName
toappName:appName:versionName
. Also, it means that currently it is not possible to update the application name using theappversion update
command, which is not consistent with the SSC UI.How can we make this more consistent? Simple have
--name
requireapp:version
(also allowing to rename the app), have it accept bothversion
andapp:version
, ...?