Closed awvwgk closed 3 years ago
Yes! Which commit is the first one that works with fpm?
Both of two are the first support for fpm.
a8f7ae8 would be the first in the main line here to tag as release.
Any update on this?
I have nothing to update :)
Let me rephrase, is there any concern about tagging https://github.com/fortran-lang/fftpack/commit/a8f7ae8e607f305de6d93143d9dec5eaa06d53aa as v4.0.0
?
I think it is OK. This submission a8f7ae8
only changed the structure of the file folders and added fpm support, and the Fortran code was unchanged.
Previously in netlib, this fftpack was called dfftpack 1.0, based on fftpack 4. (see doc/README in fortran-lang/fftpack)
DFFTPACK V1.0
*****************************************************************
A Double precision clone by Hugh C. Pumphrey of:
FFTPACK
version 4 april 1985
So I think using v4.0.0 should work.
Alright, I pushed the tag and created a release for it.
Thanks!
Do you think it would be useful to tag the initial version of this project? Maybe the use the first commit that works with fpm for this purpose. Even if it is only used a fixed reference point to compare against future version, for reasons of API and ABI compatibility.