Open ivan-pi opened 2 years ago
The various journals from ACM have many good articles on the reasons behind Fortran:
We undertook such an exercise to get a feel for what an "ideal" programming language for HPC applications might look like. ... Almost immediately, we were struck by what we were seeing. ... surprisingly, the "ideal" programming language was basically Fortran.
The Fortran articles in CiSE also give many good reasons for Fortran:
Perhaps we could even share some of the opinions from famous (computer) scientists:
Fortran is harder to compete with. It has a dedicated following who [...] care little for programming languages or the finer points of computer science. They simply want to get their work done. — Bjarne Stroustrup
but I'm afraid this may backfire at some point.
There are several webpages, blogs, and articles, which try to debunk Fortran myths. I think having a QA section to help resolve misconceptions at Fortran-lang could be valuable.
Here are a few links:
Roughly, I see two categories of misconceptions,
I was thinking about this topic while watching a lecture by Dan Saks on "Talking to C Programmers about C++". Here's a quote he refers to on several occasions:
Some parts of the lecture are summarised here.
Perhaps by linking such an article in replies on HackerNews, Stack OverFlow, Quora, etc., we could slowly turn the tide against misinformation surrounding Fortran.