Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Updated version for Thunderbird 9 attached (I didn't change anything else in
the meantime).
I also forgot to mention that it's for the *32-bit* version only.
Original comment by vim...@gmx.com
on 21 Dec 2011 at 9:57
Attachments:
is there a version for TB 9 that is 64-bit?
Original comment by lieb...@gmail.com
on 6 Jan 2012 at 1:33
I am using Ubuntu 10.10 (32-bit) and Thunderbird 9.0 but when I try to manually
install the addon from the .xpi file, Thunderbird pops up a red OSD that says,
"FireTray could not be installed because it is not compatible with Thunderbird
9.0". I was previously using Thunderbird 3.something and while the addon
installed successfully, it did not show the persistent mail notifications in
the top panel.
Ideas?
I really love this addon, by the way. I can't wait to get it to work for me
again.
Original comment by retsi...@gmail.com
on 9 Jan 2012 at 7:52
I guess both of you guys are not really interested in this new feature
(multiple tray icons) but in getting the basic FireTray add-on working
again with TB 9, right?
In this case, you should download and try the new official release:
->
http://code.google.com/p/firetray/downloads/detail?name=firetray-0.3.5.xpi&can=2
&q=
Because of the file size, it seems to me that both the 32- and 64-bit
versions are included.
I'm running a 32-bit system so I need to cross-compile for 64-bit
systems. I've tried it already, but I can't get scons to use the
required flags for gcc/g++'s 64-bit cross-compile mode. I would be pleased if
anyone could give me a hint here.
Nonetheless, I checked my xpi file again; it works fine with TB 9.0.1 on my two
32-bit Debian machines. Did you really use the *second* xpi file in this
thread? The first one is for <=TB 8.* (32-bit only). I should have given them
different file names...
Original comment by vim...@gmx.com
on 9 Jan 2012 at 10:06
Thanks :)
Original comment by Oleksii....@gmail.com
on 10 Jan 2012 at 8:03
I downloaded the first file because of the included comment "Updated version
for Thunderbird 9 attached". I just downloaded the second file and it works
perfectly. I cannot tell you how grateful I am! Thank you very much.
With regard to the multiple tray icons feature: I could take it or leave it. It
seems like an interesting perk that I might find I couldn't live without if I
started using it. At the moment, I am on one project so most of my email comes
into one folder and is mostly all I am concerned with. However, I can
definitely see the value in it. Additionally, it makes FireTray even more
versatile.
One thing that surprises me is that my coworker and I couldn't find ANY other
addon that did the persistent email notification that FireTray does. In our
work, we get time sensitive emails from our bosses and several clients so
without FireTray, we find ourselves either responding late to emails that we
didn't see the momentary new-mail-popup for or else regularly undergo mental
thrashing as we pop over to the email window every few minutes.
Again: Thank you for your help and for this fantastic product.
Original comment by retsi...@gmail.com
on 11 Jan 2012 at 10:01
Thanks for your feedback! Yet, I think I have to clarify something here:
1.) I'm not one of the main authors so the thanks should go to them and not to
me ;-)
2.) The two xpi files you find in this thread have to be considered
experimental. They are just for demonstration purposes so it's possible that
they include bugs, which may lead to unpredictable behavior or crashing
Thunderbird (however, nothing like that noticed by myself so far).
Hence, if you are not interested in this thread's proposed feature, I'll
recommend using the official release, which comes with TB9 support, from here
(firetray-0.3.5.xpi):
http://code.google.com/p/firetray/downloads/list
Original comment by vim...@gmx.com
on 12 Jan 2012 at 10:59
Updated version for Thunderbird 10.* (32-bit only) attached.
Original comment by vim...@gmx.com
on 1 Feb 2012 at 1:27
Attachments:
Updated version for Thunderbird 11.* (32-bit only) attached.
Original comment by vim...@gmx.com
on 14 Mar 2012 at 5:48
Attachments:
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
vim...@gmx.com
on 7 Dec 2011 at 2:02Attachments: