[Feedback]: `Requirements` and `Source` field feedback

[M0nk3yy]

What is the feature?

Some inconsistencies and general feedback:

• Quite a lot of items seem to have entirely blank fields for "Requirements", "Source", or both. (See Magic Awareness, a Barbarian subclass feature that is blank in both of these fields)

• Items that do have a source, do not include the page reference. That field is blank. (See Primal Knowledge, Bestial Soul)

• Class features that do have requirements, use a different, much longer format than the typical one used in the SRD items i.e. module shows 3rd Level Barbarian where SRD items Barbarian 3.

• Subclass features do not seem to ever have requirements. Comparatively the SRD would show Path of the Berserker 3 etc.

• I also note that the sourcebook abbreviation used is TCoE where I think TCE is the more popular, but clearly neither is incorrect. This one is mostly a matter of opinion.

What package are you reporting this for?

Tasha's Cauldron of Everything

[M0nk3yy]

Where the book field is blank, it seems that the Compendium Browser defaults to showing the module name. This results in this:

As well as being an inconsistent display, this also results in multiple options in the filters for the same book/module: