Closed shemetz closed 4 months ago
Supplemental manifest fields should go under flags
.
Yeah, changing Manifest+ to work like that would be a good solution too. I'll bring it up in its discord channel.
I'm repurposing this issue to relate to the double-counting of manifest warnings in some cases. For the specific case of the manifestPlusVersion
field we would rather not maintain a list of 'blessed-but-non-standard' manifest keys. The appropriate place for these fields is under flags
, where they will not generate any warnings. We will also implement #11066 which will suppress warnings for users that do not opt-into it, so that developers can see and address warnings in their own packages but not cause any confusion for end users.
User Experience
Currently, when the foundry setup screen opens, a lot of package warnings appear - and many of them are warnings like these:
A lot of modules contain this specific field,
manifestPlusVersion
, and for a good reason - it's an unofficial community-developed specification, defined here - https://foundryvtt.wiki/en/development/manifest-plus - and it's not a field that anyone is planning to remove, so the warnings aren't being helpful.Even though it's unofficial, I think it's popular enough that it should be ignored and treated as an acceptable field. In my own installation, these account for 45% of the package warnings I see. (the rest of the warnings are almost all about deprecated fields)