codecov-commenter
commented
5 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 80.51%. Comparing base (
256733d) to head (19566d2).
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #115 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 80.41% 80.51% +0.09% ========================================== Files 34 34 Lines 3171 3182 +11 ========================================== + Hits 2550 2562 +12 + Misses 621 620 -1 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/flow.record/pull/115/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/fox-it/flow.record/pull/115/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it) | `80.51% <100.00%> (+0.09%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=fox-it#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
It behaves the same as set_ignored_fields_for_comparison() but only for the duration of the context manager.