Closed hktonylee closed 2 months ago
I don't love this solution, and would prefer to move towards a future where the serialization-specific support code can be composed with an MCAP writer rather than wrap it entirely.
Absolutely agree. Composition would be much better solution. Let me close this PR first.
Changelog
Expose underlying writer of ROS1/2/Protobuf writers
Docs
None
Description
This is needed because the underlying writer exposes more API that are needed by end-users, for example, metadata read/write.