Call for standardized naming of the Weapons

[ComfyPillow]

Since the names and their formats are kind of all over the place right now, I guess this requires a standardized naming convention for the Static weapons. Ideally before we ship out a version in the FP Modpack.

@Cuel @Kauwgompje @Mallow234 @Tinter

Any Suggestions?

To kick this off, I'd like to suggest the following for the russian weapons:

6P50-1 'KORD'
6P50-1 'KORD' (Raised)

And for the american weapons this:

M2HB
M2HB (Raised)

The '(Raised)' Attribute would indicate that the weapon is not a low positioned weapon, which is also in line with the Bohemia standard of labeling the Low and High variants of a static weapon.

[Kauwgompje]

Your current suggestions seems good to me, what about the naming convention for the bags though? Should we keep the FP prefix on the bags or not? And will we follow vanilla bag naming or should we keep it the way we currently do it?

[ComfyPillow]

I'd say Simply drop the FP Prefix. We don't have as many Backpacks in Arsenal, so it won't make things too unorganized compared to something like the Uniform category.

[Cuel]

:+1: for the names

The bags are only the 'weapon' right? You can still use a vanilla "Tripod" bag with it? In that case, don't keep FP imo

Edit: Actually, don't keep FP... I don't see the reason for bags to have prefix but not the weapons

[ComfyPillow]

@Cuel https://github.com/fparma/fp_static_weapons/commit/6133a4cd93100d2a1c42ab4af9d9394b10a91743 Boom.

Removed the custom bags and used the vanilla tripods. The weapons are compatible with the following Vanilla Tripod Backpacks now:

#define BAG_COMPATIBLE_ARRAY "B_HMG_01_support_F","O_HMG_01_support_F","I_HMG_01_support_F", "B_HMG_01_support_high_F","O_HMG_01_support_high_F","I_HMG_01_support_high_F"

Reduced amount of bags by ~40%, but was required to have Seperate weapon bags for Lowered and Raised Static weapon variants (Vanilla is limited by the same issue)

Also removed the FP Prefix from the backpacks.

[Cuel]

:+1: