Now that we have a folder where both the host-machine and fractal-server-container user have read&write access (ref #10), would it make sense to do the same for the /tmp/fractal_test folder? At this point, I think it's convenient to keep everything in the current folder (as we are doing for fractal-data).
One possible naming scheme: we rename fractal-data into fractal-share (or tmp, or something like that), and we use subfolders like data, tasks and artifacts).
Now that we have a folder where both the host-machine and fractal-server-container user have read&write access (ref #10), would it make sense to do the same for the
/tmp/fractal_testfolder? At this point, I think it's convenient to keep everything in the current folder (as we are doing forfractal-data).One possible naming scheme: we rename
fractal-dataintofractal-share(ortmp, or something like that), and we use subfolders likedata,tasksandartifacts).