Closed mga47 closed 4 months ago
What "fields" are we talking about here? Individual cells (with single digits) or the overall "sms confirmation view" component?
It's about individual cells, not the whole component.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 19:31 Anton Stulnev @.***> wrote:
What "fields" are we talking about here? Individual cells (with single digits) or the overall "sms confirmation view" component?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/fraggjkee/sms-confirmation-view/issues/13#issuecomment-2166014825, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJRHJBVIFVA2HLOAURYXODZHG3L5AVCNFSM6AAAAABJILSITOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRWGAYTIOBSGU . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Hm... Maybe I'm missing something here, but why do they need to validate
individual symbols? Can't you guys just assign some ID to the
SmsConfirmationView
itself and then in your automation tests locate that
view and check the actual entered code via the enteredCode
property?
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 17:38, Gar Mkrtchyan @.***> wrote:
It's about individual cells, not the whole component.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 19:31 Anton Stulnev @.***> wrote:
What "fields" are we talking about here? Individual cells (with single digits) or the overall "sms confirmation view" component?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/fraggjkee/sms-confirmation-view/issues/13#issuecomment-2166014825>,
or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJRHJBVIFVA2HLOAURYXODZHG3L5AVCNFSM6AAAAABJILSITOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRWGAYTIOBSGU>
. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/fraggjkee/sms-confirmation-view/issues/13#issuecomment-2166031730, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJKO5OZ7KAWKPEVRM5BNGLZHG4F5AVCNFSM6AAAAABJILSITOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRWGAZTCNZTGA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
I view this component as a kind of EditText so it just provides the text (code) that is currently entered, individual cells are internal details that can be changed to let's say 1 single drawing phase without actual subviews, in this case it won't technically be possible to assign distinct IDs to each symbol.
On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 at 09:56, Стульнев А.Ю. @.***> wrote:
Hm... Maybe I'm missing something here, but why do they need to validate individual symbols? Can't you guys just assign some ID to the
SmsConfirmationView
itself and then in your automation tests locate that view and check the actual entered code via theenteredCode
property?On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 17:38, Gar Mkrtchyan @.***> wrote:
It's about individual cells, not the whole component.
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024, 19:31 Anton Stulnev @.***> wrote:
What "fields" are we talking about here? Individual cells (with single digits) or the overall "sms confirmation view" component?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub < https://github.com/fraggjkee/sms-confirmation-view/issues/13#issuecomment-2166014825>,
or unsubscribe < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADJRHJBVIFVA2HLOAURYXODZHG3L5AVCNFSM6AAAAABJILSITOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRWGAYTIOBSGU>
. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/fraggjkee/sms-confirmation-view/issues/13#issuecomment-2166031730, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJKO5OZ7KAWKPEVRM5BNGLZHG4F5AVCNFSM6AAAAABJILSITOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCNRWGAZTCNZTGA . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
Same here, I also see use it as single view component. Okay, I'll try to understand their issue in that case, thanks for reply.
Closed
Can you please add Id's when creating fields? I get issue from QA team.