Closed soypat closed 4 years ago
Hi men! A lot of tenkius, it is really helpful. About "es andaPor" yes, it will be just "andaPor", today i wasn't time to fix it.
About declaring variables i like that, if i can it will be something like that.
And about the conditions, i love the nakever
.
Tomorrow i will take a look all this
Pd: sorry, camelCase is the best
Pd2: i must make a conduct / contributing guidelines.
Update:
Just andaPor
Done.
nakever
not equal operation Done. (not commited yet)
As a side note to this, I'd like to point out that nakever
comes across (to the 'English eye') as having some kind of relation with 'nake' or 'naked', by just catching a brief glimpse of it.
I'd suggest that you change the spelling of that keyword to naquever
.
Hm idk... This language is pointing to argentos, not to yankis... But maybe.
Maybe i can make a pull about that, i will see.
Seeing as there is no code of conduct or contributing guidelines yet, forgive the title.
I'll be grouping several sintaxis recommendations in one issue because they really stand out as bad decisions from the get-go to me.
es andapor
The
messi es andaPor 10
asmessi == 10
does not sound good on the tongue. Proposal: Using justandapor
would arguably sound more argento.multiple variable declaration
This can be a hell of a lot to write just to declare a couple of variables. If you want your language to be successful, and I know it will be because who doesen't want to operate on numbers with
ma
andmeno
, then you gotta figure a shorthand way of doing it. Proposals:che messi, maradona, batistuta son 10, 10, 9
// son could also bees
che ricky_fort, mirtha son 100
Inequality conditions
cachitomenoque
cachitomaque
mayoigual
menoigual
nadakever
I'd stick with the all lowercaps convention, less of a headache to write and as they say: se entiende, no?