Investigating pydantic v2 upgrade

[iamchrisearle]

Description

Experimental branch showing known issues with updating to pydantic V2

Closes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• [ ] This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

• [ ] Test A
• [ ] Test B

Checklist:

• [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
• [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
• [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
• [ ] I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Next Steps

• [ ] Assign a reviewer based on the code owner document.

• [ ] Once your review is approved, merge and delete the feature branch

On behalf of the Modis Tools Dev Team, thank you for your hard work! ✨

[iamchrisearle]

For when we do upgrade to higher pydantic versions, this fix will help with coercing the URL to behave like a string:

https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic/issues/7186#issuecomment-1874338146

[jamie-sgro]

@cearlefraym what's the status of this PR?

[iamchrisearle]

@cearlefraym what's the status of this PR?

This is for knowledge transfer, it can be closed. If/when switching to pydantic v2, this is important behavior to need to build around.