Closed rye closed 9 years ago
I'm generally not a fan of code within a string. I don't feel like DRY extends to calling class methods. So I'm not sure if I like this or not. :/
Hmm. While I agree about the code within a string thing, I do think it'd be good to not call File.<method>
repetitively.
I will create the release for v0.1.1
without this request merged, and then we can merge it later in another patch release.
Since this is irrelevant to how stuff works, you can merge it. I don't really love it, but I don't hate it enough for it to warrant me delaying stuff.
Okay.
Merging into master
, will release v0.1.1
after that.
Saying
File.
a lot is non-DRY-compliant. I think it's better to useclass_eval
.(From 682655e269b1c7101e31c11e5c45374fed93b2b4):