Closed tobyDoh closed 2 years ago
Since the webinterface is already quite "full", I'd prefer only to add necessary configuration options. What is the benefit of adding a configuration option to configure the MQTT port? Especially in relation to all other network ports we are using? If we start making one of them configurable, we would have to do the same with all the others as well. If you are looking for security through obfuscation, it won't bring much in a local network where local users connected to the network can easily monitor the unencrypted communication on all ports.
Letztendlich ist es Bequemlichkeit.
Ich habe auch den Standard Port gelassen, aber mein Sonoff Adapter im iobroker kommt mit dem übertragungstext nicht klar, ein weiteren MQTT Broker/Client Service hab ich auf 1884 am laufen...Jetzt müsste ich es neu flashen, hab ich aber keine Lust... Jetzt hab ich Glück das es einen Adapter gibt für iobroker somit bleibt es wie es ist...
Ok, thanks.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. MQTT Port is currently hard-coded in Programm
Describe the solution you'd like Have the MQTT Port avaiable as Option in header as variable or better as option in webinterface
Describe alternatives you've considered changing the coding prior to compiling process
Describe your own contribution i will test the changes