The additionalProperties directive seems to undergo validation like being a member inside the properties object.
Would a PR on this issue be welcomed? Or is there a specific reason for the current behavior, and would you like it to stay as it is?
Later edit: actually, this is part of draft 7. So you just went incremental here and haven't yet reached this piece. Anyway, is there some work in progress to pass the Drat 7 tests? (I ask because I can help, but at the same time, I am not attracted to duplicated work).
The
additionalProperties
directive seems to undergo validation like being a member inside the properties object.Would a PR on this issue be welcomed? Or is there a specific reason for the current behavior, and would you like it to stay as it is?
Later edit: actually, this is part of
draft 7
. So you just went incremental here and haven't yet reached this piece. Anyway, is there some work in progress to pass the Drat 7 tests? (I ask because I can help, but at the same time, I am not attracted to duplicated work).