Closed NilsWildt closed 2 weeks ago
Hi, it isn't incorrect: it is the return of the anonymous function created by the do
block. However, it became a bit "noisy" so I removed returns from do
blocks in #70. You probably just need to update Runic.
I see -- and indeed, had to update. Didn't think of my shared @ runic where it ran! Thank you.
In
as it becomes:
It seems that Runic adds a return in front of the @info. I guess it's the with_() do end syntax?