Open spences10 opened 7 years ago
Do we need the local storage as via LevelDB? Cannot we have alternative that is compatible with zeit's now?
The only thing the local storage is for is the encouragement via sentiment so users are not spammed by the bot more than once a day
So, if that feature isn't needed then () => now
But, I think it will be quite straight forward to set up a simple GraphQL backend with GraphCool :ok_hand:
But we need something to not to spam the users. I remember, intially it was a mess when the bot started until you joined the wagon.
Ok, so if https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/100DaysOfCode-twitter-bot/issues/80#issuecomment-320220231 is a success we can store that information there 😄
Wrong issue being referenced in the PR
Which one?
The one which closed the issue 🙃
This issue was referenced in the PR I made to my fork then when I came upstream it closed this issue 👍
This issue still needs to be open 💯
If the bot was to not use local storage via LevelDB then it could be turned into an immutable deployment with zeti's now.