Closed Sboonny closed 1 year ago
Sorry, @Sboonny, I didn't see @gikf's comment (and your conversation) when I made my suggestion.
While there are some things we can do to ensure that the table has one record, I would just go with @gikf's approach, but with a comment on the migration to explain why we're not generating ids automatically.
Sorry for the delay on this one, but I think it's a bad idea to update the database without including the code that makes use of those updates. Reason being I can't follow the logic about how this is used. Also, more generally each PR should "do one thing", but this PR "does half a thing". I hope that makes sense!
Could you combine this PR with https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/chapter/pull/2467 ?
Update README.md
).main
branch of Chapter.Closes #2408