Open run-time opened 9 years ago
I'm not interested in adding commercial API docs to DevDocs, sorry.
firebase would be nice +!
Why does it matter if it's commercial? I think it's a popular API that many devs are using. +1 for Firebase docs
I'm not interested in adding commercial API docs to DevDocs, sorry.
@simon04 I know this is a really old and closed issue, but could this be reconsidered?
I understand that the philosophy of devdocs
might be to only list documentation of open-source tools and libraries, but Firebase is one of the most used BaaS in the world.
Now that the Firebase Emulator Suite is out, it's possible to work with Firebase without having access to the internet, the only thing that's missing is offline documentation.
Good, the docs https://firebase.google.com/docs/reference use a free license:
Except as otherwise noted, the content of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License, and code samples are licensed under the Apache 2.0 License. For details, see the Google Developers Site Policies. Java is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates.
I'm not opposed to adding Firebase to DevDocs, but I will not write the scraper.
Someone would have to come up with a PR. To get started, see https://github.com/freeCodeCamp/devdocs/blob/main/docs/adding-docs.md
Now that Google owns Firebase and with Angular integration does it make sense to add the Firebase API documentation to devdocs?
https://www.firebase.com/docs/