Closed seynard closed 7 months ago
I have published an issue that may be similar (https://github.com/freebayes/freebayes/issues/777), does it work better if you used a higher min-alternate-fraction? does it work better if you use a freebayes version lower than 1.3.1?
This issue is marked stale because it has been open 120 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days
This issue was closed for lack of activity. Feel free to re-open if someone feels like working on it.
Hi,
I'm running freebayes for de novo variant calling on Oxford Nanopore Technology sequencing data (bam files produced by PromethION) for pool sequenced experiment. I'm testing freebayes on a chromosome for 15 pools and it stays stuck after 7Kb. It does not get killed but it also does not write anymore. I looked at my row data on IVG and I do not have a large coverage in this region (just a couple of X) as it as been mentioned in the issue #614 (https://github.com/freebayes/freebayes/issues/614). If I run freebayes with 3 pools the calling is performed but form 4 pools onwards (any of them) it gets stuck. Here is the command i'm running:
freebayes -f ${fasta} --min-alternate-count 1 --min-alternate-fraction 0.01 --use-best-n-alleles 2 --cnv-map ${bam_list} --pooled-discrete ${dirwork}/freebayes/*${c}.header.sorted.rename.filter.bam | vcffilter -f "QUAL > 20" -f "AF < 1" | vcffilter --or -f "TYPE = del" --or -f "TYPE = ins" -f "TYPE = snp" > ${dir_work}/freebayes/${c}.freebayes.vcf
I already tried to ask for more memory (up to 500G), without success. Would you have an idea where this issue is coming from?