Closed agallant closed 8 years ago
Related topic - https://github.com/willscott/webrtc-adapter/issues/9 - if we make the adapter directly support node it may be a good way to generalize the fill.
i thought the goal of #152 was to fully kill off the old core.peerconnection api, and the way to do that was to take the smarter stuff like chunking in there and have it as a freedom module that relies on core.rtcpeerconnection?
Agreed on the first part (the full goal is to get rid of core.peerconnection), didn't know the second part. I'll take a fresh look through some of the linked issues, but it sounds sensible.
Makes core.peerconnection depend on the webrtc-adapter fill, which is also what core.rtcpeerconnection depends on. Related to #152.