Open ninavizz opened 5 years ago
Good feedback from a friend w/ journalism expertise; captured below in my own notes from a verbal conversation
Metadata from documents is unlikely to be associated with the source themself, unless it's images they shot on their own device or a file they created on their personal machine
Detection of "document tracking" in printed documents may not be likely by the journalists themselves? It is still not known to many, exactly how printer dots are detected.
If a source is one of a small group of individuals that have access to privileged information, that is more likely to be used against them in future legal action—not metadata.
What stands-out as a larger priority is the source establishing a social contract with journalists wrt exactly how much of the information they've shared will get published. Will an org publish the full document, will they remove metadata and/or redact it before publishing, will they not publish the document and just quote from it, or will they just describe the revelations from it without even mentioning that a document exists?
yellow,
though they may be safe to restrict to color laser printers (albeit not known entirely)?@olivemartini @huertanix @eloquence @kushaldas @harlo @redshiftzero ^^ Eyes/Thoughts on the above? I've created a Figma file for this, so that folks can edit directly in the wireframe. If you'd like to do that, please ping Nina for a Figma invite. :)
Footer prioritized for rev2 for @eloquence's 1.0 UI updates!
Summary in 01 Aug UX meeting; TL;DR page sought for +1.0 release.
Content for this in-progress, with Content for Source Safety Guide being tracked in the main SD repo.
Problem
Design + User Goals
Solution
1.0.0
Working materials
unsafe network
link