Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Note to self: also register these intents at openintents.org
Original comment by skippy.hammond@gmail.com
on 2 Jan 2011 at 12:30
Change checked in, wiki page added.
Original comment by skippy.hammond@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2011 at 12:19
oops - this hasn't been checked in yet.
florent: ISTM that these intent action strings really should be fully-qualified
(ie, with leading com.googlecode.gtalksms), especially if we want to register
them at openintents.org. What I don't quite understand is why they are *not*
currently - the leading "." in strings in the manifest should magically get
that prefix appended.
Regardless, would you like me to re-submit this patch so that it uses
fully-qualified intent names everywhere (and at the same time, change the
string literals to a public static strings on the service (ie,
MainService.ACTION_SHOW instead of the literal...)?
Original comment by skippy.hammond@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2011 at 1:26
Sorry I didn't see your patch.
I changing package path each time I'm making a donate version. It's the only
way to deploy 2 versions of the application. Eclipse project add automatically
the full path.
Original comment by Florent....@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2011 at 1:30
> Eclipse project add automatically the full path.
I don't quite understand this. In my testing, I had Tasker use the action
string ".GTalkSMS.SEND", and all of our code checks only for that string (and
works). But if eclipse is adding the package name to the intents in the
manifest, I'd expect that to *not* work - that Tasker would have needed to use
the fully-qualified name to find the service to send the intent to (and in that
case, our code would have ignored it - it assumes no leading prefix). Do you
have any idea why that would be the case? (Note that I only told tasker the
intent name and that it was targeted at a service - I didn't tell it the
package or service name to receive it)
Original comment by skippy.hammond@gmail.com
on 3 Jan 2011 at 1:41
Fixed in 1.6
Original comment by Florent....@gmail.com
on 4 Jan 2011 at 10:22
Holy shit this is awesome. I just realized I hadn't bought the donate version
yet. Will gladly do so, unless you have a way for me to drop you a fiver
separate from the market, or if you'll differentiate the donate version on
features at some point.
Keep up the great work, both! My mind is already spinning at what I can do with
some of this stuff... absolutely great!
Original comment by chriscar...@gmail.com
on 6 Jan 2011 at 10:34
Issue 63 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by fschm...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2011 at 6:42
Issue 35 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by fschm...@gmail.com
on 27 Jan 2011 at 6:42
Original comment by fschm...@gmail.com
on 25 Aug 2011 at 7:51
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
skippy.hammond@gmail.com
on 31 Dec 2010 at 5:14Attachments: