There should be a conflict check for state: renamed, especially for modules that support to apply multi item changes like for example ipauser and ipagroup.
The check should ensure that a multi item change with a name conflict is failing as a complete transaction before a single change is applied. For each rename, there needs to be a check that there is no existing item with the same name and also that there is no name conflict (name and rename) within the transaction. Additional complexity due to sorting of the items to fix name conflicts within the transaction is not the goal.
There should be a conflict check for
state: renamed, especially for modules that support to apply multi item changes like for example ipauser and ipagroup.The check should ensure that a multi item change with a name conflict is failing as a complete transaction before a single change is applied. For each rename, there needs to be a check that there is no existing item with the same name and also that there is no name conflict (name and rename) within the transaction. Additional complexity due to sorting of the items to fix name conflicts within the transaction is not the goal.
Related: https://github.com/freeipa/ansible-freeipa/issues/1174#issuecomment-1863267473