Open mlissner opened 3 years ago
On it.
Another example reported by a client here: https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/4824587/de-mendoza-v-commissioner/
This is strange and I think there is something strange about the anon- database that it relies upon. It appears to have competing page numbers but I can only verify one set when I look at other sources so im going to only show one for now.
Great to see you digging into this one. Is it possible it has multiple page numbers from multiple parallel citations?
There's some weird stuff going on with the HTML of this opinion:
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/2753804/evans-v-commr/
@flooie can you take a look?