freelawproject / recap

This repository is for filing issues on any RECAP-related effort.
https://free.law/recap/
12 stars 4 forks source link

Docket Case Name Mismatch #331

Closed brianwc closed 1 year ago

brianwc commented 1 year ago

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64863529/uab-planner5d-v-meta-platforms-inc/

which one can tell from the URL who the true parties are, shows up instead as "bey v. Campa (3:22-cv-09154)" on the RECAP docket page. The name and case number is correct in search results.

mlissner commented 1 year ago

@albertisfu can you please take a look at this just to see if it's something that happened recently or whether it is one that was screwed up before we made the fixes? I'm hopeful it's been messed up awhile and that it's not evidence that we still have the scrambled docket issue.

albertisfu commented 1 year ago

Yes, of course, I'm checking this one and I'll be back with my findings.

albertisfu commented 1 year ago

I checked this one, yeah it seems this happened before the RECAP extension fix.

The case was created on Aug. 2, 2022 and it was uploaded with pacer_case_id 406733 that belongs to the "bey v. Campa" case but, the HTML uploaded was from a different docket:

Screenshot 2023-01-31 at 17 35 13

mlissner commented 1 year ago

Great news. I suppose we'll be cleaning these for awhile as they pop up.

@brianwc, this one was a bit of a mess, so I just nuked it and re-uploaded it.