Closed brianwc closed 1 year ago
@albertisfu can you please take a look at this just to see if it's something that happened recently or whether it is one that was screwed up before we made the fixes? I'm hopeful it's been messed up awhile and that it's not evidence that we still have the scrambled docket issue.
Yes, of course, I'm checking this one and I'll be back with my findings.
I checked this one, yeah it seems this happened before the RECAP extension fix.
The case was created on Aug. 2, 2022 and it was uploaded with pacer_case_id
406733
that belongs to the "bey v. Campa" case but, the HTML uploaded was from a different docket:
Great news. I suppose we'll be cleaning these for awhile as they pop up.
@brianwc, this one was a bit of a mess, so I just nuked it and re-uploaded it.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/64863529/uab-planner5d-v-meta-platforms-inc/
which one can tell from the URL who the true parties are, shows up instead as "bey v. Campa (3:22-cv-09154)" on the RECAP docket page. The name and case number is correct in search results.