Open sentry-io[bot] opened 8 months ago
I think this is not a CaseQuery page. Case Query pages have a table-like "header", and the erroring document has not. From the test cases, 2 examples of CaseQuery pages:
This HTML page (s3) seems like a Case Query Advanced, specifically a "Parties" page. juriscraper is not prepared to parse this yet. But, apart from that, CL called the wrong parser (EDIT: I see that we do not support this kind of pages yet)
def process_recap_case_query_result_page(self, pk):
"""Process case query result pages.
For now, this is a stub until we can get the parser working properly in
Juriscraper.
"""
OK, so this is more of a RECAP extension bug. We shouldn't be sending the "Select a Person" page to CL in the first place. If it were a useful page, I'd say we should add support for it, but since it's not, yeah, we can just make sure the extension doesn't send it.
I'll refile this issue over in the recap repo.
I think this is a parse failure for a PACER docket. Can we take a look and see if a tweak makes sense?
Sentry Issue: COURTLISTENER-5DS