I'm just reading this article, and got a little confused by the part in brackets of this sentence:
Instead, we want to focus on things that apply to every library and bundler (or lack of bundler).
So, does the "lack of bundler" means this kind of scenario, that we want to package a library, but using no bundler?
Hey!
I'm just reading this article, and got a little confused by the part in brackets of this sentence: Instead, we want to focus on things that apply to every library and bundler (or lack of bundler).
So, does the "lack of bundler" means this kind of scenario, that we want to package a library, but using no bundler?
Thanks!