Open SvenRoederer opened 4 years ago
In the recent builds the images (for >4MB flash) include 2 variants of the batctl-package in parallel
When both packages are installed it's not well defined, which variant is used by calling /usr/sbin/batctl. This probably started when upstream introduced these variants in https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages/commit/129986825219d6d276098da8fe419e206bb9a056 some time ago. This I saw by having a look into the .manifest file of the images.
/usr/sbin/batctl
What is the expected behaviour? Only one variant of the package should be installed.
Firmware Version: at least recent master-code (5725069daae00b3cc301d70b1be4d9deebb5e8d2)
a simple exclusion from the package-list, via -batctl-tiny did not do (d321c9f77e7f234d5ba2a712ea147f9c1ba59868). I assume the tiny-variant is pulled by some dependency.
-batctl-tiny
Bug report
In the recent builds the images (for >4MB flash) include 2 variants of the batctl-package in parallel
When both packages are installed it's not well defined, which variant is used by calling
/usr/sbin/batctl
. This probably started when upstream introduced these variants in https://github.com/openwrt-routing/packages/commit/129986825219d6d276098da8fe419e206bb9a056 some time ago. This I saw by having a look into the .manifest file of the images.What is the expected behaviour? Only one variant of the package should be installed.
Firmware Version: at least recent master-code (5725069daae00b3cc301d70b1be4d9deebb5e8d2)