freifunk-berlin / meta

Selbstorganisierung der Berliner Freifunk Community
https://berlin.freifunk.net
0 stars 0 forks source link

Future of DNS/TLD #7

Open noxilixon opened 1 year ago

noxilixon commented 1 year ago

How do we solve DNS while we migrate from olsrd to babel? Which TLD should we use in the future?

nicolasberens commented 10 months ago

Since only these TLDs are reserved: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2606#section-2

We should either use one of those or a "real" domain.

E.g. $service.internal.berlin.freifunk.net

Pro rfc2606:

Con rfc2606:

Pro Real:

This "might" lead to problems if someones distributes

noxilixon commented 9 months ago

Pro Real:

I would propose $service.ff.berlin as domain, because it is short, easy to remember and already in the hands of the community. Owner should be the legal entity of the community that is still to be created.

adam-burns commented 2 months ago

Pro Real:

Back in May, we presented sig0namectl at the Freifunk Berlin monthly meetup. sig0namectl allows secure, decentralized DNS update capabilities within Freifunk (for those that wish to use it).

Since then, we've achieved quite a few milestones:

With respect to both internal (& soon optional externally) available services, we have been testing Wide Area DNS Service Discovery, which offers more interoperability and flexibility of service types than a single 'service' label.

For more information on the current status and capabilities of this project, see the sig0 website and github repo.

Noki commented 2 months ago

.internal is now reserved as well and intended for internal use: https://www.icann.org/en/announcements/details/icann-seeks-feedback-on-proposed-top-level-domain-string-for-private-use-24-01-2024-en