Closed OfotViking closed 7 years ago
TL;DR: Try author
instead of dc:creator
for the field.
I added a tool to help with debugging this kind of thing in the future. "show_sample_entry.py".
It pulls a feed URL, parses it, and shows the parsed data for the first entry in the feed.
For that feed I get:
{ 'author': 'Twitter (@twitter)',
'author_detail': {...},
'authors': [...],
'guidislink': True,
'id': 'https://twitter.com/twitter/status/785903425451982848',
'link': 'https://twitter.com/twitter/status/785903425451982848',
'links': [...],
'published': 'Tue, 11 Oct 2016 19:02:32 +0100',
'published_parsed': time.struct_time(tm_year=2016, tm_mon=10, tm_mday=11, tm_hour=18, tm_min=2, tm_sec=32, tm_wday=1, tm_yday=285, tm_isdst=0),
'summary': '<p class="TweetTextSize TweetTextSize--26px js-tweet-text '
# [... removed for length ...]
'width="250" />',
'summary_detail': {...},
'title': '+ = #TravelTuesday\n'
' https://twitter.com/i/moments/785873728018214912\xa0'
'…pic.twitter.com/Ss4QEQZoI5',
'title_detail': {...},
'twitter_place': '',
'twitter_source': ''}
The feedparser library handles some field specially. Looks like "dc:creator" gets automatically changed to "author" and also parsed into a more complicated data structure (that we can't use yet).
ERROR:main:process_field:dc:creator:no such field
source: http://twitrss.me/
My config:
Can't see if it is a re-tweet or not