Closed m1ci closed 7 years ago
Above is example of NIF 2.0. NIF 2.1 introduce provenance info. Trial form should generate NIF 2.1 version specific examples and call.
I see, so if I add nif-version=2.1 then there should be provenance info, right?
Yes, here is an example:
<http://freme-project.eu/#offset_35_48>
a nif:OffsetBasedString , nif:Phrase ;
nif:anchorOf "federal state"^^xsd:string ;
nif:annotationUnit [ a nif:TermOccurrence ;
rdfs:label "federal State"@en , "federal state"@en ;
itsrdf:taAnnotatorsRef <https://services.tilde.com/terminology> ;
itsrdf:taConfidence 0.9286
] ;
nif:beginIndex "35"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
nif:endIndex "48"^^xsd:nonNegativeInteger ;
nif:referenceContext <http://freme-project.eu/#offset_0_68> ;
itsrdf:term "yes" ;
itsrdf:termInfoRef <https://term.tilde.com/terms/2905188> , <https://term.tilde.com/terms/357570> , <https://term.tilde.com/terms/619435> .
thanks, clear now!
Using the API dev documentation page https://api-dev.freme-project.eu/doc/api-doc/simple.html#!/e-Terminology/e_terminology I submitted content for processing and in the output there is no provenance information present (
itsrdf:taAnnotatorsRef
).here is what I get